Deprecated: Return type of Dotenv\Repository\AbstractRepository::offsetExists($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/forthrig/public_html/wp-content/plugins/anycomment/vendor/vlucas/phpdotenv/src/Repository/AbstractRepository.php on line 147
Deprecated: Return type of Dotenv\Repository\AbstractRepository::offsetGet($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/forthrig/public_html/wp-content/plugins/anycomment/vendor/vlucas/phpdotenv/src/Repository/AbstractRepository.php on line 155
Deprecated: Return type of Dotenv\Repository\AbstractRepository::offsetSet($offset, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/forthrig/public_html/wp-content/plugins/anycomment/vendor/vlucas/phpdotenv/src/Repository/AbstractRepository.php on line 163
Deprecated: Return type of Dotenv\Repository\AbstractRepository::offsetUnset($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/forthrig/public_html/wp-content/plugins/anycomment/vendor/vlucas/phpdotenv/src/Repository/AbstractRepository.php on line 171
Deprecated: Return type of PhpOption\Some::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/forthrig/public_html/wp-content/plugins/anycomment/vendor/phpoption/phpoption/src/PhpOption/Some.php on line 151
Deprecated: Return type of PhpOption\None::getIterator() should either be compatible with IteratorAggregate::getIterator(): Traversable, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/forthrig/public_html/wp-content/plugins/anycomment/vendor/phpoption/phpoption/src/PhpOption/None.php on line 118
Comments on: Number of Divisors of an Integer
https://forthright48.com/number-of-divisors-of-integer/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=number-of-divisors-of-integer
learning never endsMon, 29 Oct 2018 03:31:22 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8
By: forthright48
https://forthright48.com/number-of-divisors-of-integer/#comment-125
Mon, 29 Oct 2018 03:30:29 +0000https://forthright48.com/2015/07/11/number-of-divisors-of-an-integer/#comment-125Sohana Akter.
You are right. Thanks. The * signs went missing during migration. Fixed.]]>
By: Sohana Akter
https://forthright48.com/number-of-divisors-of-integer/#comment-123
Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:13:38 +0000https://forthright48.com/2015/07/11/number-of-divisors-of-an-integer/#comment-123
By: forthright48
https://forthright48.com/number-of-divisors-of-integer/#comment-120
Sun, 23 Sep 2018 14:45:48 +0000https://forthright48.com/2015/07/11/number-of-divisors-of-an-integer/#comment-120Indrojit Mondal.
Well, in the worst case (when we are trying to factorize some large prime), it is O(P(sqrt(N))), where P(n) is the number of primes less than n.
In practice, this is good enough. Usually problems give you composite numbers for factorization. But I did once get TLE by using this code. For that problem, the judge data contained lots of Prime numbers and that resulted this code to perform its worst. I passed that problem by adding a check for prime inside the loop.]]>
By: Indrojit Mondal
https://forthright48.com/number-of-divisors-of-integer/#comment-9
Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:51:16 +0000https://forthright48.com/2015/07/11/number-of-divisors-of-an-integer/#comment-9
By: Misbah Ahmad
https://forthright48.com/number-of-divisors-of-integer/#comment-59
Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:29:32 +0000https://forthright48.com/2015/07/11/number-of-divisors-of-an-integer/#comment-59